The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford- Review

Spoiler Alert.

Hey Guys,

This review is a throwback to one of my favorite films of all time; The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. This film did not particularly win over reviewers at its time of release, but over time has gained a loyal following and re-considered critical opinions. This film is one of my personal favorites because it was the first identifiable westerns that I enjoyed; never before a particular fan of the western genre this film much in the same vein as No Country for Old Men,disguises itself from its genre by rethinking and reimagining typical genre conventions.

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (T.A.O.J.J) was released in 2007 after its initial 2006 release date was postponed so the film could spend longer in post-production; starring Brad Pitt as Jesse James (and also producing) critics widely claimed that his performance was outclassed by the mastery of Casey Afflecks turn as Robert Ford, James’ eventual killer. The film also has stunning cinematography from legend Roger Deakins (BSC, ASC) who seemingly paints onto the lens, unafraid to expose audiences to panoramas of the old west for almost uncomfortable lengths of time. If this sounds tiresome, I must insist that within the precise pacing of the film it is a completely valid technique. Furthermore Deakins illustrates his flashbacks beautifully, simply acknowledging them with a simple fisheye lens and some chromatic aberration, yet these simple identifiers serve the film well and never transcend the boundary of become too flashy or modern.

Anyone assuming this movie is all about murder is completely wrong, the bold title is taken  from Ron Hansennovel of the same name; though it does not explain nor particularly allude to the true motives of the film. The best way to describe Andrew Dominics approach to the film to move away from the (perhaps) expected conventions of a ‘shoot-em-up’ western and instead suggest that it’s a psychological breakdown of James’ relationship with his diminishing gang. As he grows older James because incredibly suspicious of the company he keeps (apart from his family) and becomes excessively paranoid that he will be double crossed; though you never feel like his skills and talents are being compromised due to his growing animosity; we see this in one scene where Ford is flirting with the idea of killing James in his sleep, but as soon as his feet touch the boards James cocks his gun and with one growl insists Ford goes back to bed-this is a truly captivating moment.

T.A.O.J.J was nominated for roughly 53 awards, almost entirely within the categories of Best Supporting Actor for Affleck and Best Cinematography for Deakins, however the film only won 18 of these-none of them household names. However many top critics have since given T.A.O.J.J place in their top ten lists of 2007, with the film taking at least 7 top three places in the lists by names such as The HollyWood Reporter, Variety, USA Today, CNN and Empire Magazine.

To anyone reading this review that still hasn’t seen T.A.O.J.J I urge you to watch it; I fully acknowledge that it may not be to everyone’s taste, most likely due to its methodical pacing and ambient nature but if you can overlook these aspects of the film the action, beauty and character depth truly make up for them in tonnes.

If you haven’t worked it out yet, see this film NOW.

Peace,

Matt  :)

Advertisements

The Attack on Education.

“It Will Be a Long and Difficult Fight and it Will Be a Fight in Vain Unless We Fight Together, Shoulder to Shoulder-“

Banner put together by me.

[8:30pm 30/11/10] That was an exerpt from the opening speech made today at the ‘The Attack on Education’ meeting at Bournemouth University; a meeting inspired by the events of the last few weeks regarding student protests over a proposed raise in tuition fees. Around 150 people (out of the estimated 16,000 students at Bournemouth University) attended the meeting today, to learn, discuss and advance their ideas among peers.

This group, needless to say-was a group with members all opposed to the proposed rise in tuition fees whenever they may be introduced, so the content of the presentation in this regard catered to the audiences needs. I must say I found it very surreal to be sitting in a lecture hall being blasted with rally material for two hours, regardless the speaker made his points with white words on a stark, black background that could do nothing but remind me of propaganda posters circa 1939; this aside I tried to focus on the content of the pitch and became wide eyed at the spectacle unfolding before me.

The first third of the presentation was not about student fees (a recurring theme during the two hours) but about the state of the British economy. (You can click on the image below to view the employment figures for the last 24 years) We are preached to how the Goverment would prefer to save banks than ‘people’, how the companies are too big to fail and it is us, the working man who has to pay for their mistakes; these are very valid points and I do believe their need to be highlighted-plus if the Government really did pay £1.8 trillion to bail out the banks, I am sickened. Also raised in the seminar was the point, do men and women who have graduated with the benefit of a free education pay back it’s worth by working full-time and contributing to the economy? This was a point raised in the open discussion which I will arrive at in just a moment but I would just quickly like to highlight what was shown in the second half of the meeting.

Click for Full Image

As time was runnning low for the presenters the first speaker opted out of two thirds of his speech, instead letting a colleague present what in essence was ‘How Rubbish England is Compared to the Rest of the World’. This presentation is a lot more open and less pressured; detailing how Skandinavian countries run free courses taught by industry proffessionals and how tution fees for most countries don’t even make up half of what we pay here in the U.K. I did notice however that the lecturer sourced his information from wikipedia, which provoked a cynical chuckle from me and my peers. Though the presenter finished strongly, quipping that according to current tax rates if we were to drink one more glass of wine a day we would not need the government cuts at all.

However I would like to also talk about the open floor discussions held; as this ended up overiding the main speakers presentations decending into cheap argument. Of course everyone is entitled to their freedom of speech (a right exploited by the student protests), but after an hour of cheap shots and sweeping statments I became very detached form the situation-dissapointed by what was happening in front of me. After the seminar I pondered as to how so many people with the same beliefs can be have such polar ideologies; saying this I do not want to digress but just to cover overall, what I think happened.

Click for Full Image

During the open floor debate there were a lot of interesting points made and I think that I learnt new things; the reservations I had though came from some sweeping statements made that i knew were completely falliable, and though examples escape me at the time of writing, lets just say there were a lot of ‘the government want to enslave us and harvest our organs’ theories going around. The excitement of an old man calling for revoloution was dulled by a pompous  woman smelling a conspiracy; the spark of a young girl willing to learn, extinguished by passive ideologists waiting for their world vision to sail in. I must admit I got quite frustrated at the apparent lack of level headed, objective individuals who wanted to take on the matter in hand; as I said to my friend who was with me at the time ‘Everyone’s just making points about stuff, but no one’s making sense’. Though the one point that was not undermined by anybody was the notion that: ‘-we are fighting against the raise in tuition fees, when men like myself got our educations for free. Why fight for cuts, one day and then protest for something else the next? Rebel against everything.’

Overall I must say that going into the meeting I was very alligned to the student’s ideals and if there was more public information (a point raised) I would feel inclined to protest too; but having left and reflected I can’t help that feeling the majority of the body in attendance wanted the opportunity to fight against the Government and not perhaps, the laws it threatens to instate. I don’t wan’t to be overly pessimistic but should we as a student body want to be heard, we must be coherent and objective; which leads me nicely onto my ending quote, recited at the meeting yesterday on behalf of Tony Benn:

In an abandoned mining town, a boy falls down a old shaft. The townspeople gather around wanting to assist the boy; they dangle down the shaft a piece of rope-but it is too short. They find another piece of rope, but that too is too short; they then find a third piece of rope which again, is too short. ‘What will we do?’ Wonder the townspeople, before hearing the boy shout up from the bottom of the shaft ‘Why don’t you try tieing them all together!?’

Peace,
Matt  :)